Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Agribusiness: A Case Study in A Brazilian Agro-Industrial Cooperative

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37497/2965-7393.SDGs-Countries.v6.n00.30

Keywords:

Sustainable entrepreneurship, Sustainable agribusiness, Sustainable development goals (SDGs), Cooperative

Abstract

Purpose: To identify sustainable practices in an agro-industrial cooperative in Rio Grande do Sul - RS (a southern state of Brazil well known for its significant participation in the national production of agribusiness), correlating them to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda, as well as analyzing how sustainable entrepreneurship is transforming the lives of families and the space where they live.

Methodology/approach: The study used primary data collection through a semi-structured interview that took place in July 2020 with the Environmental Coordinator, also made use of secondary data with observation, document analysis through consultation on the cooperative's website, documents, and internal controls to generate evidence convergence and strengthen construct validity through source triangulation, in which case study findings are supported by more than one source of evidence.

Originality/Relevance: Sustainable entrepreneurship refers to the discovery, creation and exploitation of business opportunities that contribute to sustainability, generating socio-environmental gains for society.

Key findings: The studied Cooperative assumes a socio-environmental responsibility role through the developed activities that generate value to the cooperative members in an innovative, safe, and sustainable way, in addition to benefiting the surrounding community with sustainable practices, therefore the Cooperative in question is certified with the Certificate of Environmental Distinction, proving its commitment to sustainable development and good environmental practices. Educational and environmental practices that contribute to the promotion of sustainability in agribusiness were identified, such as the use of clean technologies in production and the proper management of waste generated by agro-industrial activity. These practices generate socio-environmental gains for society.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: This study brings a relevant theoretical contribution linked to sustainability and entrepreneurship in agribusiness based on findings in the practices of a cooperative. In addition to also contributing at an environmental level, this work contributes to contributing to the financial and social pillars that sustainability encompasses.

Author Biographies

Daiane Johann, University of Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina

Doctoral student in Administration at the University of Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, specializing in the research area of Sustainability, Organizations, and Society (2020). Member of the Study Group on Sustainability and Management - GESeG. Holds a Master's degree in Administration from the Graduate Program in Administration, focusing on Strategic Management and Market Relations, at the Meridional College - IMED - Business School (2016). Specialist in Talent Development and People Management from the Sociedade Educacional Três de Maio - SETREM (2008). Bachelor in Administration from the University of Passo Fundo - UPF (2007). Experienced in teaching undergraduate courses in Administration, Accounting, Economics, and Technology Management in Human Resources and Logistics.

Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora, University of Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina

Doctoral student in Administration at the University of Vale do Itajaí. Holds a Master's degree in Administration from the University of Southern Santa Catarina and a Master's in Engineering and Knowledge Management from the Federal University of Santa Catarina. Specialist in Law. Completed undergraduate studies in Administration at the University of the State of Santa Catarina and in Law at the Federal University of Santa Catarina. Served as a State Councilor of the Brazilian Bar Association, Santa Catarina Section (OAB/SC) for the 2019-2021 term. Currently a Federal Prosecutor for the Attorney General's Office of Brazil, an active member of the Institute of Lawyers of Santa Catarina (IASC), and the Director of the Law and Diversity Center at the Higher School of Law in Santa Catarina - ESA/SC (2022-2024). A researcher with the GESeG Group (UNIVALI/CNPQ). Experienced in the field of Law, focusing primarily on Public Administration, Public Law, Sustainability, and Performance Evaluation.

Camila Angelucci , University of Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, Santa Catarina

Holds a Master's degree from the Professional Program in Business Management at the University of Alicante and from the Academic Program in Administration at Univali - University of Vale do Itajaí. Specialist in Management, Planning, and Organization of Events from the Pythagoras Unopar University. Bachelor in Tourism and Hospitality from the University of North Paraná. Worked as a course instructor at the National Service for Commercial Learning, teaching subjects in technical courses on Social and Corporate Events, Regional Tourism Guide, and Business English. Possesses extensive experience in the field of academic, corporate, and social events.

Lilian da Silveira Guimarães, SENAI - Departamento Regional de Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina

Boasts three years of leadership experience in Portugal and southern Spain. Holds a degree in Professional and Technological Education from the Federal Institute of Santa Catarina (2019). Postgraduate in Marketing Management from Faculdade Intervale (2020), in People Management and Leadership from Faculdade Intervale (2020), and in Logistics and Operations Management from Faculdade Intervale (2021). Served as an instructor for both distance learning and in-person technical courses at Senai SC (2019-2020). Content creator (textbook and LMS) for the subject of International Business in the technical course on foreign trade at Senai SC (2020). Taught the technical course in Human Resources at the Dr. Jorge Lacerda Education Center (CEDUP) in Florianópolis, SC (2019). Coordinated technical courses in Administration, Logistics, Accounting, Human Resources, and Real Estate Transactions at the Dr. Jorge Lacerda Education Center (CEDUP) in Florianópolis, SC (2020-2021 and 2023).

References

Aghelie, A., Sorooshian, S., &Azizan, N. (2016). A. Research gap in sustainable Entrepreneurship. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, n. 12, p. 1-6.

Alves, A. O., & Leal, A. C. (2003). Pressupostos teóricos e metodológicos do planejamento ambiental. Formação (Online), 1(10).

Balakhrisnan, R., Toscani, F. Como o boom das commodities ajudou a reduzir a pobreza e a desigualdade na América Latina. Insights & Analysis on Economics & Finance. IMF Blog. 21 de junho de 2018. Available: <https://www.imf.org/pt/Blogs/Articles/2018/06/21/blog-how-the-commodity-boom-helped-tackle-poverty-and-inequality-in-latin-america>. Access on: [Jun 2023].

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, n. 3, p. 197-218, 2005.

Barbiere, Jc; Simanton, Ma. (2007). Organizações Sustentáveis Inovadoras. São Paulo: Atlas.

Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisbon: Editions 70.

Binder, Julia Katharina; Belz, Frank-Martin. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: what it is. Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Research, p. 30-72, 30 jan 2015. Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781849808248.00010.

Borges, C.; Borges, MM; Ferreira, VRS; Najberg, E.; Tete, MF (2013). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Proposition of a Typology and suggestions d and Research. Magazine of Entrepreneurship and Management of Small Businesses, vol. 2, n.1, p. 77-100.

Boszczowski, Anna Karina; Teixeira, Rivanda Meira. (2012). O Empreendedorismo Sustentável e o Processo Empreendedor: em busca de oportunidades de novos negócios como solução para problemas sociais e ambientais. Revista Economia & Gestão, v. 12, n. 29, p. 1-28, PUCMG.

Brazil. Ministry of Agriculture and Environment. Brazilian agriculture in numbers 2020. Available at: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/politica-agricola/todas- publicacoes-de-politica-agricola/agropecuaria-brasileira-em-numeros/agropecuaria-brasileira-em-numeros -October-2019. Accessed on: Jul 2020.

Brazil. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply. Agribusiness Projections Brazil 2016/17 to 2026/27. Long Term Projections. Available: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt- br/assuntos/politica-agricola/todos-publicacoes-de-politica-agricola/projecoes-do-agronegocio/projecoes-do-agronegocio-2017-a-2027-preliminary-version-25-07-17.pdf.

Buainain, A. (2006). Agricultura familiar, agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável: questões para debate. IICA, Costa Rica.

CNA. Confederação da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil. Panorama do Agro. Available: <https://www.cnabrasil.org.br/cna/panorama-do-agro#_ftn1>. Accessed on: Jul 2020.

Cohen, B; Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity, and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 22, n. 1, p. 29-49.

Da Silva, D. B. Sustainability in Agribusiness: economic, social, and environmental dimensions.

De Souza Ramos, J. R. N.; Santos da Silva, M.; De Almeida Neto, P. P. (2015). Limitações na responsabilidade socioambiental no agronegócio do oeste baiano. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade – RGSA, v. 4, n. 1, p. 30-45.

Dean, T.; Mcmullen, J. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 50-76, 2007.

Elkington, J. (2012). Sustainability, cannibals with knife and fork. São Paulo: M. Books of Brazil.

EMF, (2013). Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). Towards the Circular Economy, vol. 1 (2013). (Isle of Wight).

FAO. (2021) Organização das Nações Unidas para Alimentação e Agricultura. Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Disponível em: [https://www.fao.org/brasil/pt/]. Access on: [Jun 2023].

Foster, A., Roberto, S. S., & Igari, A. T. (2016). Economia circular e resíduos sólidos: uma revisão sistemática sobre a eficiência ambiental e econômica. Encontro Internacional Sobre Gestão Empresarial e Meio Ambiente, São Paulo.

Gibbs, G. (2009). Análise de Dados Qualitativos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Gil, AC (2007). Metodologias e Técnicas da Pesquisa Social. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

Haldar, S. (2019). Green entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector–a case study of Gujarat. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.

Hockerts, K.; Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus Emerging Davids: Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, p. 481-492.

IBGE. (2020). Atlas digital nacional do Brasil. Available at: https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br/. Access on: [Jun 2023].

Kuckertz, A.; Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions: investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, p. 524-539.

Lawrence, A.; Weber, J. (2005). Post, J. Business and Society. New York: McGrawHill. Malhotra, N. (2012). Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma Orientação aplicada. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

MAPA (2020). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Projeções do Agronegócio Brasil 2016/17 a 2026/27. Projeções de Longo Prazo. Available: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/politica-agricola/todos-publicacoes-de-politica-agricola/projecoes-do-agronegocio/projecoes-do-agronegocio-2017-a-2027-preliminary-version-25-07-17.pdf. Access on: [Jun 2023].

Marconi M; Lakatos, E; (1995). Metodologia Pesquisa Científica. São Paulo: Atlas

Minayo, M. C. De S. (1994). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 3 ed. São Paulo. Hucited/Abrasco.

Morgan, G. (1996). Imagens da Organização. São Paulo: Atlas.

Oliveira, Eds The importance of the final destination of empty pesticide containers. Uniabeu Magazine, v. 5, no. 11, p. 123-135, 2012.

Paulo, T. B. D. (2021). A sustentabilidade no agronegócio a partir de uma análise jurídica. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE, São Paulo, 2021.

Paz, F. J.; Kipper, L. M. Sustentabilidade nas organizações: vantagens e desafios. GEPROS: Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas, Bauru, Ano 11, n. 2, p. 85-102, 2016.

Sachs, I. (1994). Estratégias de transição para o século XXI. In: Bursztyn, M. (Org.). Para pensar o desenvolvimento sustentável. São Paulo: Brasiliense, p. 29-56.

Schaltegger, S.; Wagner, M. (2008). Types of sustainable entrepreneurship and conditions for sustainability innovation: from the administration of a technical

challenge to the management of an entrepreneurial opportunity. Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 27-48.

Schaper, M. (2002). The essence of ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, p. 26- 30.

Schumpeter, J. (1934) The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Schymura, Luiz Guilherme (2023). Choque de renda de commodities explicou surpresas do PIB, mas vento está virando. Portal do IBRE. FGV. Available: <https://portalibre.fgv.br/sites/default/files/2023-07/07Ce2023%20Carta%20do%20IBRE.pdf> Access on: [Jun 2023].

Sehnem, S. (2019). Circular business models: Babbling initial exploratory. Environmental Quality Management, 28(3), 83-96.

Shepherd, Da; Patzelt, H. (2011). The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking "What Is to Be Sustained" with "What Is to Be Developed." Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, vol. 35, no. 1, January, p. 137-163.

Souza Filho, Hm. (2009). Desenvolvimento Sustentável Agrícola. In: Battle, MO (Coord.). Gestão Agroindustrial. v. 1 – 3. ed. – 3. reprint. – São Paulo: Atlas, p. 665-710.

Souza, G. M. F. (2020). Empreendedorismo Sustentável: Estudo de caso na Associação de Agricultores de Hortifrútis Orgânicos na cidade de Juazeiro Do Norte–CE. Revista Inteligência Competitiva, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 16-35.

United Nations Organization. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision: highlights. New York, 2014.

USDA. (2020). United States Department of Agriculture. Production, supply and distribution. Available: https://www.usda.gov/nutrition-security. Access in: jun 2023.

Vergara, SC (2000). Começando a definir a metodologia. Projetos e Relatórios de Pesquisa em Administração, v. 3, p. 46-53.

Yin, R. K. (2005). Case Study: Planning and Methods. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Young, W.; Tilley, F. (2006). Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate. Business Strategy and the Environment, no. 15, v. 6, p. 402-415.

Zahra, S. et al. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 519-532.

Żak, A. (2015). Triple bottom line concept in theory and practice. Social Responsibility of Organizations Directions of Changes, 387, 251-264.

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

Johann, D., Nora, G. A. M., Angelucci , C., & Guimarães, L. da S. (2024). Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Agribusiness: A Case Study in A Brazilian Agro-Industrial Cooperative. Review of Sdgs in Emerging Countries, 6(sdgs), e0030. https://doi.org/10.37497/2965-7393.SDGs-Countries.v6.n00.30